Propose to compare the two documents and draw their own conclusions. I noticed for example that bot

The first law of dialectics immigration canada - the unity and struggle of opposites. I would not call it a law, as it is not always evident in the phenomena of nature and social life. But the history of the American Revolution (1776-1783 gg.) Has a vivid example of the unity and struggle of opposites. It is associated with the meeting in 1776 of the Second Continental Congress (hereinafter DCC) - meeting immigration canada political activists and governments 13 North American colonies of Great Britain and with the adoption of DCC two conflicting documents.
Write historical immigration canada works are not the most objective researchers. However, some progress in this regard is the case. The former Soviet Union there are more studies that apravyargayuts myths of pre-Soviet and Soviet history. But not enough material on world history, especially in the Belarusian language. So often the perception of U.S. history in the former USSR is the Soviet ideological fairway.
Many people know that July 4, 1776 DCC adopted the Declaration immigration canada of Independence, now known as the Declaration of Independence. But few know that the July 5 document was developed, which entered the history as the "Petition olive branch" (Olive Branch Petition). John Dickinson, one of the delegates DCC developed this document July 5th, 8th petition was sent to King George the third, on behalf of the Congress, but the king refused to negotiate with the DCC. (See: An Outline on American History. Published by US Information immigration canada Agency, r.72) If the Declaration of Independence declares riyals 13 North American colonies and Britain threatened war, the petition assured the British king in his devotion to American colonists.
I am far from thinking that "Congress" July 4 before signing the Declaration of Independence drank well, and on July 5 realized what they had done and wrote a letter of repentance to King. Likely DCC was meeting people with different views. Some were willing to die for the independence of the colonies, such as John Hancock, who wrote his name in large letters under the Declaration to the king could read it without glasses (because for every such separatism immigration canada "Congressman" immigration canada could pay life). Others were ready to kiss the king and his soldiers pens to avoid civil war. And this expression - no ridicule from my side. The war for American independence was the Civil War. Black slaves and white planters 13 colonies together with the Indian army fought against the colonists, led by Washington. Revolution is not supported by many Anglican priests and British officials, for whom the homeland was all the British Empire not only colonies in America, the Quakers, who believed violence sin, farmers who sell food to the soldiers of the king for hard currency - gold and silver - and refused to feed an army colonists for paper dollars. Hundred thousand were expelled from the colony for his loyalty to the Crown, tens of thousands of loyalists were killed in the fighting. The petition was therefore immigration canada a possibility to avoid war. King George the third of her distressed and paid for ridicule lives of many soldiers and colonists.
However, the first edition of the Declaration, and then petitions on behalf of the same revolutionary immigration canada government showed that the DCC could not manage Union 13 colonies effectively and consistently, and that those who followed the Revolution, risked their lives for the government, immigration canada which he could not understand what he wants.
Propose to compare the two documents and draw their own conclusions. I noticed for example that both documents immigration canada signed activists of some of the 13 colonies. It should be remembered that the people in these colonies were not asked whether they independent or not; property qualification and some other kinds of restrictions allowed small groups of politicians to act on behalf of the entire population of the colonies, including the poor, and slaves zhanshchyn decide their fate and did not even try to ask their position on these issues. Therefore, from a legal standpoint, neither the Declaration immigration canada nor the petition are not an expression of the political will of the American people - the population of the 13 colonies. And the name of the meeting - the Continental Congress said that its members have taken it upon themselves to make decisions not only on behalf of the English colonists, but the French and Quebec and the North American Indians.
Declaration of Independence on the Belarusian transferred my students from the Institute of entrepreneurial activity, and the olive branch petition transferred student of International Relations of Belarusian State University Christina Tytsyuk.
Cal and the course of events and give in to that unit and n with people forced to cancel due cal floor and as I connect it to the people immigration canada and nshym, occupy an independent in po tion among the states in the world to which he is entitled under m law of nature's God, and pavazhl hundred tion tion to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare immigration canada the causes, and l and encourage him to such a separation me.
We start them with the obvious truth that the cross People and created a ro nym and endowed by their Creator PE nym NOT ademlimymi right to l and k as are life, liberty, and to mknenne shch