The conversation on the radio today is extra apt because we Monday. April 28 heard in the media to

Rasmus Rosenberg innovation Larsen May 15, 2014 See & Hear scandal is a unique proof that Edward Snow's revelations are acts of the highest democratic values. Edward Snow's point was that mass surveillance, in addition to being unconstitutional, creates ...
See & Hear scandal is a unique proof that Edward Snow's revelations are acts of the highest democratic values. innovation Edward Snow's point was that mass surveillance, in addition to being unconstitutional, provides a basis for criminal exploitation of the data collected.
Four weeks ago I participated in the program Bugged on Radio 24syv. Here we talked about Edward Snowden and mass surveillance - with a particular focus on the little paranoid question: "What is your deepest secret worth?"
Radioanledningen came in the wake of an article I wrote the week before, where I presented a little daring point of view; that in the near future would see a budding (illegal) market for the sale of personal information - due to the rapidly increasing global surveillance.
Thus, a description of an anxiety-provoking innovation social scenario where all your fellow potentially have access to one's deepest secrets. A quite natural view in the light of Edward Snow's revelations of mass surveillance volumes.
The conversation on the radio today is extra apt because we Monday. April 28 heard in the media to See & Hear demonstrably already frequent users of such an illicit market. My predictions for the future was no longer innovation questionable, paranoid, but acted so (not surprisingly) about reality in Denmark.
We can most likely determine that the See & flax actions are both illegal and punishable. Politicians are the same reasons agree that we should crack down on such illegal use of personal information.
The ironic and sad thing is that very same politicians continue to ignore the episode of See & Hear, above all, is an empirical innovation evidence of the seriousness of it, Edward Snowden tried to warn the international community.
Edward Snowden fight today an honorable struggle to demonstrate innovation that our democratic society is governed by a strongly growing mass surveillance, which he there believes is detrimental to citizens' privacy - and ultimately innovation damaging to the freedom innovation that we all recognize as a central part of our community innovation basis.
It is now very clear that we should regard See & Hear and Edward Snowden innovation as opposites. Edward Snowden tried to warn the world of mass monitor the scale and effects. See & Hear convinced Edward Snow's allegations of mass monitoring must effects. Should a political condemnation of See & Hear therefore not also lead to a political acceptance of Edward Snow's actions?
Either way, condemns many politicians continue both Edward Snowden and See & Hear. These politicians explained by the fact that we still have not seen an exercise of intelligence innovation services with data collection. innovation It was, after all data and information collection innovation from the Nets (and others) who were taken advantage of in See & Hear scandal.
Martin Krasnik demonstrated by its questions, in deadline Monday. May 5, this kind of political and cynical distortion. The deadline -studiet was activist Peter Kofod asked why there was actually innovation nothing wrong with collecting data - since it is not tantamount to a stranger browsing these data through.
It has Martin Krasnik course right there. Sitting not an employee and end facing each collected megabytes, and continue, legally and officially speaking, be well-founded suspicion of a crime before these data can officially be used.
This leads many, including politicians, to the naive conclusion that as long as there is no suspicion of crime, remains the data in the intelligence services professional care. It takes comfort in words at the thought that sensitive personal data is left untouched in the safe hands of the intelligence services.
With very limited resources to Edward Snowden rob the undisputed sensitive information from the world's indisputably most secure organization (NSA). What does that tell you about data security? Something tells me that in the near future will see a gross exploitation of intelligence data on individuals if the words are not already innovation in place.
The idea that it is potentially possible for a person A, to pay for personal information about person B, everything else is just a deterioration of d