three of press Orlando
One. What I mean by RESET? malala yousafzai Press the end of the business as it is now, followed possibly by media owners written decision to support journalism as a social service. If you will take, as before, for profit or political interest journalism has no chance in Romania. For large profit era version of the sunset. malala yousafzai Again, I think only two national newspapers will make profit in 2011: financial newspaper Gazeta Sports.
Opinions? After three years of losses / investments (see Patriciu with 100 million stuffed in Truth & Co), would be willing malala yousafzai to support other media owners to take losses as a service social media? malala yousafzai
It's an interesting statement, I met internally when discussing the passing thought exclusively in the digital environment. Speaking of thinking, the "time zero" site Gandul.info increased by ~ 600,000 unique has almost as RomaniaLibera.ro unique visitors a month.
Which means that, most likely, the GSP application for the iPad has generated revenue as the 250,000 euros invested. Tablets are the future, not the present, as everything explodes internet for years and I remain with this explosion of fireworks in the trunk waiting
This entry WAS posted on Friday, December 23rd, 2011 at 10:49 am and is filed under Media. You Can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You Can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
seemed most interested end of the article >> Q: Am I missing something essential from the list of questions above? A: There are still too many questions for an industry malala yousafzai in decline. If you insist, would be more questions than readers.
One. Though not say and I do not give the impression that one realizes it must be stressed that talk of "the end of the business press," as was done in Romania in the last 10-15 years. I mean writing techniques malala yousafzai in a soup (the 90), and combinations sordid handling - normally the bubble burst, it was not a scalable model. The journalism works in the normal economy, that need to be properly informed human remains. See point 2.
February. Still need journalism. Thought do not always know if journalism going on HuffPo idea of "intellectual tabloid" My personal feeling malala yousafzai is that it is blind and dumb in the country stands out because it has a dust competition, which perceives the Internet as a problem rather than a opportunity. And thought, aside from the brand loyal community remains a site well indexed by search engines
March. malala yousafzai They return money invested head, so going with investments. malala yousafzai 250k euros to put a tablet media product waiting for you to breakeven in 2-3 years in Romania malala yousafzai means the poor management at least. And Patriciu not invest money only prolonged the suffering of dying 15 years speculating inertia journalists to papa money every boy's lap. His specific interests, not the desire to do press.
a, we have no interest in the print media, I do not :))
is an exercise in imagination, branding and distribution model that does not rely on selling to even so was profitable anyway, that does not mean I would love to question print market ... laid stress end of the article because it is shattering what is happening and to recognize it as Tolo.
I wrote here, the price of ipad application was exaggerated, not to say that real but not bloated. However meritanici not even a quarter of the people have more freedom to read a site on ipad or iphone without malala yousafzai restricting navigation applications. It's a vantage and that.
Regarding the 'great editorial' on the outside of the big newspapers write reviews on matches with a man sitting with editorial headphones on. Here, not people in the stadium, JDE editorial people. Throw money. This time can be made at the level of romania newspapers on sport, the prince, with 20 people very well. And they could do recently. But the editorial is holding 80-100. It is useless and cost too much, are too long dead.
Way of thinking, as a regular reader (say kind of "intellectual tabloid" as you say cute), I can say that the transformation from appearing malala yousafzai in online and what is now I find embarrassing. OK, plus 600,000 unique visitors, but those are the Freedom and CanCan, not elsewhere. After all, if you are willing to pay that "quality" of thought, it's ok, that business.
My problem occurs when a publication like that made social campaigns. No, you can not "save Christmas" while they promote video editing with Peter craete (or whatever his name is). You can not scroll that only a difference to have a campaign Moralo ethical-social and "see here how ot punched
One. What I mean by RESET? malala yousafzai Press the end of the business as it is now, followed possibly by media owners written decision to support journalism as a social service. If you will take, as before, for profit or political interest journalism has no chance in Romania. For large profit era version of the sunset. malala yousafzai Again, I think only two national newspapers will make profit in 2011: financial newspaper Gazeta Sports.
Opinions? After three years of losses / investments (see Patriciu with 100 million stuffed in Truth & Co), would be willing malala yousafzai to support other media owners to take losses as a service social media? malala yousafzai
It's an interesting statement, I met internally when discussing the passing thought exclusively in the digital environment. Speaking of thinking, the "time zero" site Gandul.info increased by ~ 600,000 unique has almost as RomaniaLibera.ro unique visitors a month.
Which means that, most likely, the GSP application for the iPad has generated revenue as the 250,000 euros invested. Tablets are the future, not the present, as everything explodes internet for years and I remain with this explosion of fireworks in the trunk waiting
This entry WAS posted on Friday, December 23rd, 2011 at 10:49 am and is filed under Media. You Can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You Can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
seemed most interested end of the article >> Q: Am I missing something essential from the list of questions above? A: There are still too many questions for an industry malala yousafzai in decline. If you insist, would be more questions than readers.
One. Though not say and I do not give the impression that one realizes it must be stressed that talk of "the end of the business press," as was done in Romania in the last 10-15 years. I mean writing techniques malala yousafzai in a soup (the 90), and combinations sordid handling - normally the bubble burst, it was not a scalable model. The journalism works in the normal economy, that need to be properly informed human remains. See point 2.
February. Still need journalism. Thought do not always know if journalism going on HuffPo idea of "intellectual tabloid" My personal feeling malala yousafzai is that it is blind and dumb in the country stands out because it has a dust competition, which perceives the Internet as a problem rather than a opportunity. And thought, aside from the brand loyal community remains a site well indexed by search engines
March. malala yousafzai They return money invested head, so going with investments. malala yousafzai 250k euros to put a tablet media product waiting for you to breakeven in 2-3 years in Romania malala yousafzai means the poor management at least. And Patriciu not invest money only prolonged the suffering of dying 15 years speculating inertia journalists to papa money every boy's lap. His specific interests, not the desire to do press.
a, we have no interest in the print media, I do not :))
is an exercise in imagination, branding and distribution model that does not rely on selling to even so was profitable anyway, that does not mean I would love to question print market ... laid stress end of the article because it is shattering what is happening and to recognize it as Tolo.
I wrote here, the price of ipad application was exaggerated, not to say that real but not bloated. However meritanici not even a quarter of the people have more freedom to read a site on ipad or iphone without malala yousafzai restricting navigation applications. It's a vantage and that.
Regarding the 'great editorial' on the outside of the big newspapers write reviews on matches with a man sitting with editorial headphones on. Here, not people in the stadium, JDE editorial people. Throw money. This time can be made at the level of romania newspapers on sport, the prince, with 20 people very well. And they could do recently. But the editorial is holding 80-100. It is useless and cost too much, are too long dead.
Way of thinking, as a regular reader (say kind of "intellectual tabloid" as you say cute), I can say that the transformation from appearing malala yousafzai in online and what is now I find embarrassing. OK, plus 600,000 unique visitors, but those are the Freedom and CanCan, not elsewhere. After all, if you are willing to pay that "quality" of thought, it's ok, that business.
My problem occurs when a publication like that made social campaigns. No, you can not "save Christmas" while they promote video editing with Peter craete (or whatever his name is). You can not scroll that only a difference to have a campaign Moralo ethical-social and "see here how ot punched
No comments:
Post a Comment