The New Pope and the Argentine Junta | The Reporter
ANALYSIS: It's already been a bone of contention was whether the new Pope, Francis One, helping the political prisoners or those who gcéasta when the Guerra Sucia, the Dirty War, 'by the junta in Argentina behind three teenage score. There is a complex issue, and it is difficult to answer without some description to the dark days in the modern history of Argentina. This was the beginning of the "dirty war" than the nginearál coup d'état on 24 March 1976 when the Army finally tj rj Isabel Peron Presidency.
It must be said that many of the people living happy with this situation in the Argentine destiny. The renowned tj rj writer Jorge Luis Borges for example, it was imputed that the military junta as a better option than the Peronistas - fan of President Juan Perón - or was understood at the time Borges was like hide Peronismo ollsmachtúil science, and should not be view by the general, phragmatúla. But, what is the thing in question was the bPeronismo?
Juan Peron was president of Argentina from the mid fifties to mid ndaicheadaí. In the seventies, he spent a year in charge of the country again, but it was his death that ended the term. Peron was one of the deepest and most permanence was impressed Argentine society in the twentieth century.
It is often said that its policies were but the Argentinian version of facism Benito Mussolini, but it probably róshimpliúchán anyway. It was largely dependent on the unions for support, and his wife Evita want poor people's tj rj life circumstances improve. At the same time he attacked the hintleachtóirí and it has the good and bad of the mighty had only disdain for the classes who were pillars by Peron. So there were a lot of people (like Borges himself) inclined to accept the junta itself in preference to any type Peronistas.
Make the situation more complicated was the split itself Peronistas which came to light when Peron returned to his homeland in 1973 after many years in exile in Spain, where the dictator tj rj Francisco Franco gave shelter to it. Peron was being worshiped by people from the radical left-wing and right wing alike, and it was clear that both sets could be tolerated so different all together in one movement. tj rj
So when the plane landed at the airport Ezeiza Perón came from two groups of people pick up the hero, and as a result there was a terrible carnage. The interpretation is given to most people that the right wing are made to force our left wing, but it is difficult to say what truth is, or appears not made any official investigation by the Argentine authorities during The two decades after the carnage.
After Juan Perón's own death was a widow, Isabel Perón, who took charge of the country. The world heard his mother tell of a Evita Peron, a woman whose husband is a peer as a politician, but had the same charism tj rj than a half share with hIsabel. Evita was the Pheronismo social conscience, but found she died in 1952, and Isabel did not take the same risk gap filling.
On the contrary, she was sympathetic to the right wing of the movement, and in supporting the Triple-A, that is, the Anticomunista or ALIANZA Argentina Anti-Communist Alliance Argentine - that is, the death squads were killing "Communists", except that his own definition of the concept tj rj of Communism: Peronistas from the left wing was a lot of them were below the Triple-A campaign.
When approached by the junta in charge of Argentina, the country was being torn apart by the war was different terrorist groups to each other: the left-wing "international", the left wing bPeronistas (the guerrilla group to be known as the Montoneros), and the death squads Triple-A. So we will not accept overboard if there was reason than anticipated by many that the junta really need to look to some of the country's life again.
Here in Europe we usually think world representing military junta in South America and ugly fascist government. Not as they seem, however. Military dictators were continents were scológa susceptibility to these poor, since from among those many soldiers came, and was athriar dictators agrarian agenda also included.
If Borges or Bergoglio did not involve tj rj the junta but pragmatúil provisional government would be willing to implement democracy again after a short time, it is difficult to be followed by them: realistic assessment was wise.
Another story however is that the Argentine military government turned out such a criminal gang
ANALYSIS: It's already been a bone of contention was whether the new Pope, Francis One, helping the political prisoners or those who gcéasta when the Guerra Sucia, the Dirty War, 'by the junta in Argentina behind three teenage score. There is a complex issue, and it is difficult to answer without some description to the dark days in the modern history of Argentina. This was the beginning of the "dirty war" than the nginearál coup d'état on 24 March 1976 when the Army finally tj rj Isabel Peron Presidency.
It must be said that many of the people living happy with this situation in the Argentine destiny. The renowned tj rj writer Jorge Luis Borges for example, it was imputed that the military junta as a better option than the Peronistas - fan of President Juan Perón - or was understood at the time Borges was like hide Peronismo ollsmachtúil science, and should not be view by the general, phragmatúla. But, what is the thing in question was the bPeronismo?
Juan Peron was president of Argentina from the mid fifties to mid ndaicheadaí. In the seventies, he spent a year in charge of the country again, but it was his death that ended the term. Peron was one of the deepest and most permanence was impressed Argentine society in the twentieth century.
It is often said that its policies were but the Argentinian version of facism Benito Mussolini, but it probably róshimpliúchán anyway. It was largely dependent on the unions for support, and his wife Evita want poor people's tj rj life circumstances improve. At the same time he attacked the hintleachtóirí and it has the good and bad of the mighty had only disdain for the classes who were pillars by Peron. So there were a lot of people (like Borges himself) inclined to accept the junta itself in preference to any type Peronistas.
Make the situation more complicated was the split itself Peronistas which came to light when Peron returned to his homeland in 1973 after many years in exile in Spain, where the dictator tj rj Francisco Franco gave shelter to it. Peron was being worshiped by people from the radical left-wing and right wing alike, and it was clear that both sets could be tolerated so different all together in one movement. tj rj
So when the plane landed at the airport Ezeiza Perón came from two groups of people pick up the hero, and as a result there was a terrible carnage. The interpretation is given to most people that the right wing are made to force our left wing, but it is difficult to say what truth is, or appears not made any official investigation by the Argentine authorities during The two decades after the carnage.
After Juan Perón's own death was a widow, Isabel Perón, who took charge of the country. The world heard his mother tell of a Evita Peron, a woman whose husband is a peer as a politician, but had the same charism tj rj than a half share with hIsabel. Evita was the Pheronismo social conscience, but found she died in 1952, and Isabel did not take the same risk gap filling.
On the contrary, she was sympathetic to the right wing of the movement, and in supporting the Triple-A, that is, the Anticomunista or ALIANZA Argentina Anti-Communist Alliance Argentine - that is, the death squads were killing "Communists", except that his own definition of the concept tj rj of Communism: Peronistas from the left wing was a lot of them were below the Triple-A campaign.
When approached by the junta in charge of Argentina, the country was being torn apart by the war was different terrorist groups to each other: the left-wing "international", the left wing bPeronistas (the guerrilla group to be known as the Montoneros), and the death squads Triple-A. So we will not accept overboard if there was reason than anticipated by many that the junta really need to look to some of the country's life again.
Here in Europe we usually think world representing military junta in South America and ugly fascist government. Not as they seem, however. Military dictators were continents were scológa susceptibility to these poor, since from among those many soldiers came, and was athriar dictators agrarian agenda also included.
If Borges or Bergoglio did not involve tj rj the junta but pragmatúil provisional government would be willing to implement democracy again after a short time, it is difficult to be followed by them: realistic assessment was wise.
Another story however is that the Argentine military government turned out such a criminal gang
No comments:
Post a Comment